<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Weights Vs. Machines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lazymanandhealth.com/free-weights-vs-machines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lazymanandhealth.com/free-weights-vs-machines/</link>
	<description>Get Healthy with Me, One Post at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandhealth.com/free-weights-vs-machines/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandhealth.com/?p=321#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>The more efficient your training tool is, the less efficient you have to be.  And the more efficient you have to be, the more &quot;functionality&quot; you will develop and will be able to apply to life and sport.  So, there is a functional continuum that moves from machines to conventional free weights to things like kettlebells, Clubbells, gymnastics rings, etc.

I think the best use for strength training machines is when you need to specifically target a muscle for prehab or rehab purposes, so that you can later integrate that muscle into more functional movements.  This is a paradigm shift though, since most of the fitness industry is still focused on the &quot;physique&quot; mentality of developing muscles instead of focusing on movement.  By focusing on movement first, and allowing the muscle to develop as it will, I find you end up with a much more natural looking development, and at the same time the strength you acquire is much more transferable to daily life.

Cheers,
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more efficient your training tool is, the less efficient you have to be.  And the more efficient you have to be, the more &#8220;functionality&#8221; you will develop and will be able to apply to life and sport.  So, there is a functional continuum that moves from machines to conventional free weights to things like kettlebells, Clubbells, gymnastics rings, etc.</p>
<p>I think the best use for strength training machines is when you need to specifically target a muscle for prehab or rehab purposes, so that you can later integrate that muscle into more functional movements.  This is a paradigm shift though, since most of the fitness industry is still focused on the &#8220;physique&#8221; mentality of developing muscles instead of focusing on movement.  By focusing on movement first, and allowing the muscle to develop as it will, I find you end up with a much more natural looking development, and at the same time the strength you acquire is much more transferable to daily life.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.lazymanandhealth.com @ 2012-02-08 20:09:57 -->
